Earthquake predictions and a triumph of scientific illiteracy in an Italian court (+ ... - Christian Science Monitor [getdailynow.blogspot.com]
Question by JJRose: What's the best way to state "internet proficiency" on a resume? I'm very proficient w/internet stuff. I just want to add it to my resume so that it sounds professional and would help w/a job requiring research. Thanks in advance! Best answer for What's the best way to state "internet proficiency" on a resume?:
Answer by garyg7
If you're looking for a regular office job, employers believe that everybody knows how to use the Internet. What do you know that makes you special? That's what employers look for in a potential employee. I hope this helps. Gary
Answer by PiggiePants
How well you use the internet may be of interest to employers if it is a beneficial skill for the company. So try to phrase whatever it is you are good at in terms a business would find attractive, i.e. Proficient in use of the interest for client research and social network marketing, or whatever
Answer by mulauthoring
If the below paragraph applies to you, you may add it in the Summary section of your resume or in the Computer Skills section with a sub-section titled Internet: Proficient in using the advanced search techniques of major search engines and in using forums, blogs, and others to find information. Also, make sure your resume addresses the needs of the employer. Read the 10 Tips for Perfect Resume Writing at http://tinyurl.com/perfect-resume Best of luck!
Is It A Good Idea To Microwave Poop?!Once again... BID on Summer's Microwave Door on eBay: tinyurl.com Poll: What's your favorite term for the brown stuff? www.micropoll.com Experiment #175: Fake Poop So yeah... we're microwaving some sh*t in today's episode... we figured: what the hell? So, you're probably wondering, Is It A Good Idea To Microwave This? Tune in to find out. Twice a week, microwave specialist Jory Caron microwaves different objects... so you don't have to! The "Jory Caron Microwave Laboratory 2.6" is a state-of-the-art facility equipped with tinfoil shielding, a ventilation system, emergency surge protectors, safety clothing, and many sexy microwaves. +++++++++++++++++++++++ Thanks to Baron102786 for donating the fake poop! www.youtube.com +++++++++++++++++++++++ ~~ Links ~~ FAQ Video --------- bit.ly Merchandise ------- bit.ly Flagged Videos --- bit.ly ~~ Connect With Us ~~ ::: Jonathan Paula ::: YouTube ---- bit.ly Facebook --- bit.ly Twitter ------- bit.ly ::: Jory Caron ::: YouTube ---- bit.ly Facebook --- bit.ly Twitter ------- bit.ly ::: Riley McIlwain ::: YouTube ---- bit.ly Twitter ------- bit.ly Facebook --- bit.ly ::: Jogwheel Productions ::: Facebook --- bit.ly Twitter ------- bit.ly ~~ Technical ~~ Created by ----- Jonathan Paula & Jory Caron Starring --------- Jory Caron, Jonathan Paula, & Riley McIlwain Camera --------- Panasonic DVX-100b, Canon Elura 100, & Canon S3-IS Software -------- Adobe Premiere Pro CS4 Computer ------ bit.ly • Jogwheel Productions © 2009 • ~
An Italian court sentenced scientists to jail time for not having a functioning crystal ball ahead of the 2009 earthquake in L'Aquila. The arguments of science and reason fell on deaf ears.
Rarely since a Catholic inquisition in Rome condemned Galileo Galilei to spend the remainder of his days under house arrest for the heresy of teaching that the Earth revolves around the sun, has an Italian court been so wrong about science.Â
Skip to next paragraph
Staff writer
Dan Murphy is a staff writer for the Monitor's international desk, focused on the Middle East. Murphy, who has reported from Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, and more than a dozen other countries, writes and edits Backchannels. The focus? War and international relations, leaning toward things Middle East.
-
In Pictures: Earthquake in Italy
Recent posts
- 10.22.12
Earthquake predictions and a triumph of scientific illiteracy in an Italian court (+video) - 10.22.12
In Indonesian business, the more things change... - 10.22.12
IssaLeaks: More fallout from the Benghazi killings - 10.22.12
Women in power are good for women's rights, right? - 10.18.12
What really happened in Benghazi?
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Today, a court in the central Italian city of L'Aquila, 380 years after that miscarriage of justice, sentenced six scientists and a government bureaucrat to six years in jail on manslaughter charges for their failure to predict a 2009 earthquake that left more than 300 people dead.
This headline isn't the sort of thing that's generally expected from Italy anymore. The church quietly abandoned its objections to heliocentrism in the early years of the 18th century, and by the early 19th, had fully accepted the scientific facts.
But according to the BBC, a modern Italian secular institution is now the one struggling to grapple with science. The seven convicted men stood accused of "inexact, incomplete, and contradictory" information about the risks posed by tremors in the weeks ahead of the April 6, 2009, earthquake that caused so much destruction.
The seven, all members of the "National Commission for the Forecast and Prevention of Major Risks," were convicted after an apparently emotional trial in which the testimony of people who had lost loved ones was allowed, as if it was relevant to the question of whether current science can predict earthquakes. No grief, no matter how great, can answer that question (which is a resounding "no," by the way).
The scientific consensus has been clear on this for some time. As much as the world would like the ability to predict earthquakes, it's eluded the best efforts of scientists for decades. The plate-tectonic revolution in geology held out some hope for greater predictive abilities as it gathered steam in the 1950s and 1960s. But while scientists have a much better understanding of why earthquakes happen and where they're likely to occur than at any point in human history, their predictive powers are so vague as to be practically useless â€" beyond recommending people shouldn't live in quake zones like L'Aquila. People are generally resistant to such advice though. The city was rebuilt after major earthquakes in the 15th and 18th centuries, just as it has been rebuilt now.
A seismologist can predict with reasonable accuracy that a certain area will have, say, a major earthquake every hundred years on average. "Area" of course being defined rather loosely. A prediction of an earthquake at 10:26 AM this coming Tuesday in Jakarta, say? Impossible. Even to promise a major quake within a one-week or one-month window is beyond human ability.
Alan Leshner of the American Association for the Advancement of Science put it this way in an open letter to Italian President Giorgio Napolitano in June 2010, urging the trial be headed off:
Years of research, much of it conducted by distinguished seismologists in your own country, have demonstrated that there is no accepted scientific method for earthquake protection that can be reliably used to warn citizens of an impending disaster. To expect more of science at this time is unreasonable. It is manifestly unfair for scientists to be criminally charged for failing to act on information that the international scientific community would consider inadequate as a basis for issuing a warning.
Of course, smaller earthquakes â€" tremors â€" do often precede major ones, and can be useful indicators that major trouble is heading down the pike. Or not. Sometimes you can have a series of tremors and no major quake. Or a major quake that doesn't appear to be preceded by any unusual activity at all. What do geologists do when asked what a series of tremors means? Use their best judgment.
That's what the Italian scientists were convicted of today: exercising judgment in a murky area, getting it wrong, and being severely punished for it. If the verdict is upheld, that sends a message to scientists that they'd better keep their mouths shut when asked for their opinion in Italy.
Joel Cohen, a professor at Columbia and Rockefeller universities who applies mathematical models to complex environmental problems, explained how the decision was made in a piece earlier this year:
Italy’s National Commission for Prediction and Prevention of Major Risks, which comprised the seven men now on trial, met in L’Aquila for one hour on March 31, 2009, to assess the earthquake swarms. According to the minutes, Enzo Boschi, President of the
Suggest Earthquake predictions and a triumph of scientific illiteracy in an Italian court (+ ... - Christian Science Monitor Articles
0 comments:
Post a Comment