White House denies US, Iran agreed to 1-on-1 talks - Jerusalem Post [getdailynow.blogspot.com]
Question by crazy baby: Question for "no shoes in the house" people? I asked a question about shoes last week and got a lot of "we have a no shoe rule in the house". I was wondering what you would do in the following case. I friend from work comes to visit and says they can't take their shoes off due to a medical reason or just says they do not like taking their shoes off. I servicee man tells you due to osha laws or company policy they are not allowed to do so? Do you allow them to wear their shoes if they wear shoe covers? Your teenager flat out refuses and says that no matter what they are not taking their shoes off, but otherwise is weel behaved? How far would you take it? A inlaw refuses to take their shoes off? Would you tell them they will have to leave? You invite a freind over and she has her toddler with her. He likes keeping his shoes on and refuses to take them off, would you just let it go to avoid upsetting the child? Or would you tell your friend they can not come in unless the shoes are off? What about the police? What if someone tell you it is aginst their religion to go without shoes? Does it bother you that someone walks on your carpet with sweaty feet? Why do you risk offending someone if you know their shoes are clean and they only comming over once in a while? Does it really hurt to just vacuum and spay some lysal after they leave? So far the no shoe people have not answered my questions. arabmuslim I hope you know that smaking a kid in the mouth will not solve every problem. You people are morons. Read the f***ing question. I'm not the one with the rule, I'm asking people who have such a rule to answer these question. Best answer for Question for "no shoes in the house" people?:
Answer by sailzar
r u ok???
Answer by Katâ„¢
That's gross. I'd say shoe covers are best in those situations.
Answer by comfy c
easy...if all of the above refuse to take off their shoes, i would invite them to sit outside to enjoy the cool breeze with some tea
Answer by gregpasq
Asking someone to put on shoe covers is rude in my opinion. It's just freaking carpet for crying out loud.....
Answer by whosaidthat?
i don't think people should be forced to take off their shoes...thats just freaky. its just carpet..and they do have steam cleaners now. i mean, what if the person has althetes foot? you make them take off their shoes and now its all over your tile...nasty.
Answer by MOMMY585
I dont' have this rule since it seems rediculious to me being as there are so many situations where people have to wear their shoes. Plus the carpets are going to get dirty anyway, just less so if yo u don't walk through mud then on the carpet. The carpets should really be shampooed every six months anyway. I am married to the man who will refuse to take his off since it takes about 5 min to put them on. I personally would perfer to never wear shoes (lol, these days I am playing bearfoot and pregnant). I think that people will respect your wishes or at least clean their feet but if they don't then they should be provided with hospital type shoe covers so that they don't get the carpets dirty if it bugs a person that much. It is a good question and you are going to get alot of answers to it. I understand it and guess I would probably enforce it as a rule if I paid like a crap load for my carpets but we rent so I don't care about them (my landlord replaces after every tenant anyway).
Answer by arabmuslim
In my religion which is Islam it's considered disrespectful to the hosts if the guests don't take their shoes off when they enter the host's house. Plus it's one of the customs in my religion to take off your shoes when you enter someone's house. I would pro bably tell them to take their shoes off anyway and if my kid ever talked back to me he or she would get smacked across the mouth.
Answer by **Mr. A**
well, i doubt anyone would refuse to take their shoes off if u ask them to. the exception being electricians and such. i'm a hindu and we have our own type of church where we can go to pray(forgot the name) oh ya! temples.. well, its against our religion to bring shoes near the god and goddess statues so the ppl at the temple told the electrician that he has to take his shoes off when he went to repair the wires. he started saying that he couldn't cuz they were protection so what else could they do. the police won't tell ppl to take shoes off....they have other things to do such as saving lives.
Answer by Smiling Penguin
I have always found it a rude practice, telling your guests to take off their shoes to come into your house. I see that it keeps dirt out...but come on, if people actually live in your house, then dirt will get in some way. Invest in some excellent door mats--i have a "scrubber" rug outside and another rug inside the door...both are quite large and are attractive. People with good manners wipe their feet well. If they don't, they hear me say "oh, let me get a paper towel" and see us cleaning up after them and learn that they should be wiping their feet off. It also forces people who cannot follow the "no shoes" rule to explain why they don't want to take their shoes off. My father-in-law is missing a couple of toes due to an industrial accident and needs his shoes for balance. Once we visited a relative with this rule--he had to explain why he couldn't take off his shoes. Would you want everyone to know your feet are short a few toes? I'm referring to people whose religion does not have anything to do with their "no shoes" rule. i know there are several religions where NOT taking them off is rude and disrespectful.
Answer by **starz**
my god relax its just shoes and carpet!!!! carpet can obviously be cleaned!!!
Answer by fairy
i think the best way to handle it is to have all the family members take off there shoes at the door that way any guests will take there's off if they can or are comfortable to do that. and just tell every one as they walk in the door to wipe there feet you just got the carpet cleaned lol. i think it is taking it to far to expect guest to take off there shoes. but i think most ppl will take them off if they see a pile of shoes right by the door.
Answer by Syd T
If you are paying the rent / mortgage on the home, then EVERYONE must follow your rules (your children, parents, visitors, workers). Otherwise it is a showing of disrespect an d lack of courage on your part !! The worst thing is that you have alowed yourself to lose this batle, and now you lose a few points with these people who will feel it easier to not obey another important rule you may make in the near future. REDEEM yourself and show that you are the boss, and they will be upset at first, but will respect you and your values more in the future. a. your FRIEND's medical reason doesn't make them sleep with their shoes on at their home. b. SERVICEMEN should have soe covers provided by you, or lay paper or old carpeting for them to walk on. c. TEENagers/kids/young adults do not tell me what they are NOT going to do in my home. period. good grades are no excuse to be rebellious. d. FRIENDS/in-laws/toddlers can be given paper booties/shoe covers, or new house slippers from you to be worn, or else wait outside. e. POLICE should be let in asap to keep them from thinking you are trying to hide something.
The White House on Saturday denied a report in the New York Times that said the Obama administration had agreed to one-on-one talks with Iran on its nuclear program.
Israel's vice prime minister responded on Sunday, however, saying Israel would welcome any direct talks between the United States and Iran.
"It's not true that the United States and Iran have agreed to one-on-one talks or any meeting after the American elections," National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said in a statement.
"We continue to work with the P5+1 (five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany) on a diplomatic solution and have said from the outset that we would be prepared to meet bilaterally."
After the White House denial, Vice Premier Moshe Yaalon emphasized that even though there is no agreement on talks, Israel would be prepared to support bilateral meetings.
"(Israel) doesn't oppose this," Yaalon said of the prospect of talks. "If Iran stops its military nuclear project as a result of direct contacts with the United States, we will be the first to welcome this."
But he added that as far as Israel was aware, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, opposed direct talks with Washington. "I believe the White House denial," Yaalon said.
The report cited Obama administration officials saying the talks will take place some time after the November 6 US presidential election, as Iran insists on knowing who the American president will be at the time.
The Times reported that the agreement was the culmination of years-long intense back-channel communications between Iranian and US officials.
The paper stated that while the announcement may enable US President Barack Obama to make a case that he is nearing a diplomatic breakthrough with Iran, it may also allow the Iranians to buy time to continue their nuclear progress.
In this respect, the Times warned that there is still a chance that the initiative could fall through, even in the event Obama is re-elected. Specifically, American officials told the paper they were uncertain whether Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had signed off on the deal, although the American understandings reportedly have been reached with senior Iranian officials who report to him.
Israeli Ambassador to the US Michael Oren also responded to the report, saying that the Obama administration had not informed Israel of such an agreement,and that the the Israel government feared Iran would use new talks to "advance their nuclear weapons program," the Times reported.
"We do not think Iran should be rewarded with direct talks,†Oren said, “rather that sanctions and all other possible pressures on Iran must be increased.â€
The United States and other Western powers have charged that Iran's nuclear program is aimed at developing nuclear weapons, but Tehran insists the program is for peaceful purposes. Israel has said it would use military force to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has attacked Obama for failing to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. The two candidates will meet on Monday in their final debate, which will focus on foreign policy.
Recommend White House denies US, Iran agreed to 1-on-1 talks - Jerusalem Post Topics THE HOUSE 2 (GAMEPLAYSDEMIERDA) - VLOGGERSDEMIERDA. P.1The house y nico culiao gay que se va en la segunda parte XDD
0 comments:
Post a Comment